Category Archives: Uncategorized

You Can’t

An epiphany this morning regarding boundaries, and representation, and dreams of an open society: you can’t sing along with every word of every song. (Note: this isn’t just about art.)

You — each and every one of us, including you — can’t sing along with every word of every song: not in empathy or sympathy, not in solidarity, not in homage. They are available for us to hear, to appreciate, but not to share.

Some of us believe, if we can’t sing along with every word of a song, that something must be wrong: the song should not have been so composed, or ever sung in our hearing, or the words should be given over to us even though they are not ours to sing.

But I want to live surrounded by great art, including art which isn’t for me or about me, except as another human being. When someone invites you to listen to a song, and you discover that you can’t sing along with every word, be even more grateful for the invitation to listen. It’s hard enough for us to know each other, without some of us always being talked over, or being shut out, or having to hide.

Ancestry

I spent a chunk of this morning communing with my grandparents, though I didn’t realize till it was almost over.

The early morning was a bit stressful. Nothing really noteworthy in terms of effect on me, just mildly grinding, the latest episode in a special feature of this week, itself a present entry in the “Saul Becomes a Parent after All” universe (exclusively available to WYRPA6DAMFASSOFATOS™ — Will You Really Pay Another $6/mo for Another Streaming Service Only for Access to One Show).

So I did what I do under stress, which is eat. And hide. There are connections to my grandparents right away in both, but they’re nuanced and interwoven with my own experience, and speculative, and so on. I don’t know that any of them were stress eaters, although I have a feeling my father’s father, Izzy, and mother’s mother, Georgie, might have been. I know he ate distractedly. I know she was anxious.

Where it gets stronger (but I wasn’t really thinking about this yet) is in what I ate, and where. Not that it was fast food chain drive-thru breakfast — only Poppy Izzy probably would have ever found that appealing on any level. But I went to two different chains, because one has the cheapest soda and the other has the best breakfast sandwich, the latter persistently but secretly available at two for one.

Hitting two different stores to get the best meal for the least money ticks a frugality box which all my grandparents shared, in different ways. Note, this involves more time and more power-cost for the drive (though to be fair in my case, one store was on the way to the other). But each grandparent could be extremely frugal and also free-spending in order to satisfy that frugality (or other priority, and their several priorities naturally differed). Hitting two different stores to get the right mix also hooks very directly to my father’s mother, Rae, who regularly sent my father and his sister to multiple markets because one of them had her standard bread and another had her raisin bread and another had her cottage cheese and another…

That breakfast sandwich has always been the best one, making it a ritual object and trips to get it a ritual for me. Everyone has rituals, including food rituals, but few people have food rituals like my Bubbi Rae, who ate the same things for the same meals on the same days of the week for longer than I knew her. This is not something I do — but it is something I am capable of, and something the appeal of which I definitely feel. (It’s just that random variety also appeals.)

Bubbi Rae would probably never have added that breakfast sandwich to her menu, though. For one thing, the meat on it is pork. Bubbi didn’t keep kosher except de facto (or maybe self-asserted de jure): what she had not already eaten, she was unlikely to eat. For another, the sandwich would certainly have struck her as too “heavy.” (Might she have accepted half? Possibly.)

My Gramma Georgie on the other hand would have had a finely-tuned appreciation for this sandwich. The structure layers are split halves of an actual biscuit: dense but soft, crumbly but moist with shortening, salty, baked to a crisp-but-unburnt edge. The meat is a patty of actual “country” sausage: salty, peppery without fire, balanced hints of onion and garlic and Scarborough Fair, course enough to be crumbly too but fine enough never to put jaw to hard work. What she would have made of the egg — scrambled, allowed to spread thin over a big griddle, and then folded over twice into a square — I don’t know. From the texture it doesn’t seem to have been frozen along the way, at least.

I ordered some of that chain’s little coin-shaped potato cakes. Normally (see food rituals, above) I eat these as I drive home, to keep them from getting cold first. Today’s batch was already cold, but otherwise in unusually good condition. I decided to try to revive them later at home. Considering whether to park and eat the sandwiches, I remembered that I had just crossed Indian Creek, and that there are parking lots in the vicinity which abut the creek. I found one such without having to make any left turns at uncontrolled intersections (an anxiety I’m sure Gramma Georgie would have shared if she’d ever driven a car) and ate creek-side. And that’s my mother’s father, Ren. It’s through and because of him (and my mother) that I know where our creeks are, and their names, and that visiting and traveling them is pleasant (with or without a meal). I also just remembered that I did cross at an uncontrolled intersection, something he positively enjoyed, especially when on foot.

Once home, I briefly considered re-frying the cakes in a pan as more efficient all around than heating the oven. Then I remembered that we’re now in possession of an “air fryer” and decided to risk using it. “What risk?” you may ask: the risk of doing a specific thing for the first time, of a sort which I’d only done a very few times. There’s Gramma Georgie’s anxiety again, though Bubbi Rae’s food rituals betray similar possibility.

I consulted the internet for advice, plugged in the air fryer, loaded the cakes into its cooking drawer, set time and temperature. Everything worked, and the sample cake I pulled out to test after five minutes of cooking was hot without having lost the hallmark textures of deep frying. With my right hand I retrieved the square paper cup the cakes were served in, and began gently shaking/sliding cakes from the cooking drawer with my left hand back into the paper cup. Some pitcher-pouring reflex led me to perform this operation holding both containers over the kitchen sink.

But the cooking drawer, albeit a flat-bottomed bowl with a handle on one side, was not designed as a pitcher. It is wider at the top than the bottom, but fairly steep-sided, with no spout. Crucially, it also has a grill rack set near the base, which rack is removable for ease of cleaning both the rack and the drawer.

I stood there, watching the cakes slide from drawer to cup, anticipating the brief joy of eating the cakes, and in retrospect I can feel Poppy Izzy strongly there. I also felt very pleased with myself for having taken the risk, and for having it pay off, for the opportunity to use a new gadget, for having made so little mess, and just the cleverness and coordination of my own hands. In retrospect, I feel my mother’s parents in their different ways in all of that. In a roundabout way I can also feel in it my Bubbi Rae, who for all of my life and years before had only partial use of one hand.

And then I tilted the drawer far enough that the rack tipped out through the mouth of the drawer and flipped onto my other hand.

My recollection of the rack’s heat is that it was not strong enough to burn, but it got my attention faster than I could evaluate it, faster even than I could recognize what had happened. By reflex I shouted, spread the fingers of my right hand apart and jerked it forward and back, knocking the rack safely away — and flinging all the potato cakes from the paper cup across the bottom of the kitchen sink basin.

I experienced a momentary mental anguish out of all proportion to the loss — Gramma Georgie there — and a purely human momentary fear as my mind caught up with events and I wondered whether or how badly I had been burned. Hours later, I can see and feel two points of contact that are minor burns, on the back of my hand just above my index finger, and just above my wrist. In the moment I didn’t feel them at all, though, and I’m usually very sensitive to them.

I found myself laughing Grampa Ren’s laugh. By this I do not mean primarily that this form of my laughter sounded like his, even in my own ears (although it does sometimes sound like his, to me and to others). I mean that sometimes my laughter feels to me that I am hearing him laugh, and this was one of those times. And, despite years of more recent conditioning, I ate the cakes out of the sink, as I’m sure any of my grandparents would have done under the right circumstances.

I don’t know what precipitated the laughter more, relief or the sudden nearly-complete reversal of my petty triumph and satisfaction. But it was the latter and the laughter itself that brought my Grampa Ren all the way forward to me. Then I was able to look back over the morning and see all four of them.

This is the lesson I now have to somehow teach my living, learning daughter: the lesson I only sometimes know in my heart as well as I do in my mind, because I am grandchild of all four of them and the lesson only came from Ren, and because I am myself and not him. The foundation of all loss, from the smallest to the largest, is absurdity.

Mourning and mirth cannot be substituted for each other, and neither should be engaged at a friend’s or a stranger’s expense, but they are not so different and can even happen together. Look for the absurdity, let the mirth in, if it presents itself, if it will not add to another’s suffering. In life, always mourn loss, but always find a way to keep moving. You can carry the important losses with you, you can laugh the others aside — and sometimes, maybe not right away, you can do both at once.

(My Bubbi Rae also taught me to keep moving, though for all of my life and years before she could not use her legs to do it. Her lesson was not about laughter, though she laughed freely, and not about letting go. Sometimes the only way to keep moving is to hold on.)

Strategery

Roman Election.jpg
By Classical Numismatic Group, Inc. http://www.cngcoins.com, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=4770357

“You must vote for my candidate so that my candidate’s opponent won’t win!”

The danger posed by any one of your candidate’s opponents, should that opponent win election, is in itself no premise in favor of your candidate’s election. It rather points directly to an over-investment of power in the contested office, and indirectly to the distortion imposed by an electoral system which provides (or privileges) only two choices.

“But, we can’t solve those systemic problems by participating in the election!”

If that were true, it still wouldn’t in itself argue in favor of your candidate. (Though it pains me to say, it would argue — albeit weakly — against participation altogether.)

But it isn’t true. Though outside parties and independent candidates operate at tremendous disadvantage, they aren’t illegal and they do exist and some of them are serious and deliberate and worthy of consideration and support. Their disadvantages should be removed — or, to put it in proper perspective, the privilege assigned to two parties should cease. Likewise, the concentration of power in certain offices and agencies should be dispersed, and the incentives to abdicate accountable power in exchange for privilege (political or otherwise) should cease.

None of this can be the direct result of voting in any number of contests under the present system. But the only electoral means available to weaken the power which results from, and which maintains, the privilege is to vote against both privileged parties; that should therefore be done whenever an agreeable outside or independent candidate presents herself (and, logically, also whenever there are no agreeable candidates at all). In tandem, other-than-electoral means should also be employed.

“That will take forever and could go horribly wrong. Besides, long before we got wherever you imagine us going, my candidate’s opponent would be in power!”

This is essentially applying the fallacious “too big to fail” standard to politics.

“Anyway, I agree with and applaud [all? the preponderance? most? certain?] of my party’s/candidate’s principles, platform, past performance, persona/e to the exclusion of any else.”

You must vote for your candidate, because you have good reason to do so. I don’t have good reason to vote for your candidate; in fact, I have good reason not to do so; I mustn’t vote for your candidate. We can trust or compare each other’s judgement as to the goodness of our reasons. To mistrust each other’s judgement as to the goodness of our reasons without having compared it is groundless.

“Some of your reasons not to vote for my candidate are things my candidate’s opponent asserts.”

I don’t pay much attention to the claims candidates or parties make about each other: I assume they include bias or are designed to induce bias. There may well be some overlap between my reasons and claims made by your candidate’s opponent[s]. My reasons are my reasons because I have judged them good. I do invite your comparison and critique, as my judgement must be imperfect.

“You wouldn’t be so critical if my candidate weren’t a member of Set S. Previous candidates and elects have done some of the things for which you criticize my candidate, and you didn’t criticize them so vociferously: you even voted for some of them. The only difference between them and my candidate is that my candidate is a member of Set S and those others aren’t. You despise members of Set S and want them excluded from politics and power.”

I don’t doubt that there are some people about whom all these assertions are true. The only one of them to which there is some truth in my case is expressed by the second sentence. I willingly own my previous failures to adequately criticize and oppose the faults of those others, whether those failures resulted from poor judgement or inattention. But no one’s (or everyone’s) failure to hold someone to account in the past can excuse that one or another from account in the present. And being deprived of a vote or an election isn’t, properly, a punishment.

The suggestion that I single your candidate out for criticism for any other reason than your candidate’s own deeds and your candidate’s present candidacy and your candidate’s occasional appeal to my principles is beneath my attention except to note the insult (to me and to your candidate and to Set S). I will say this, though. A future without oppression requires that those who have been oppressed also forego any opportunity to oppress others. This may seem unfair in some analyses. But at the very least the generational nature of the human condition renders any more superficially satisfying balance a vicious cycle.

Kansas City Museum is laying out a roadmap for mansion renovation | The Kansas City Star

This bit of news is a great parallel to the announcement earlier (“Two powerhouses of science education in Kansas City will join forces”) that Union Station‘s “Science City” museum is merging with the much older KC institution, Science Pioneers — perhaps best known as the people behind the Greater KC Science & Engineering Fair. Parallel because the contemporary Union Station facility was given its new lease-on-life at the turn of the 21st Century on the shoulders of the Kansas City Museum, whose two traditional focus areas had been KC-area history on the one hand, and science on the other.

For whatever reasons, the relationship between the Kansas City Museum and the revived station never jelled, despite the station (itself vital to KC history) beginning this phase in its history desperate to contain something, and the museum for some time prior being in desperate need of a place to put its collection. But if the split between those two allows each to sharpen its focus and thrive, I’m delighted.

Consultants for the Kansas City Museum are putting the finishing touches on strategic and business plans to set the stage for construction on new exhibit and event spaces in the mansion on Gladstone Boulevard.

Source: Kansas City Museum is laying out a roadmap for mansion renovation | The Kansas City Star

Kemper Arena could gain crucial spot on National Register of Historic Places | The Kansas City Star

Kemper Arena will soon be nominated for the National Register of Historic Places. Such a designation would qualify it for historic tax credits. That’s a key part of the financing to convert the building into a new mecca for amateur sports.

“I’m really looking forward to seeing this process wind up in a positive way. It’s been a long road,” said historic preservation consultant Elizabeth Rosin, who prepared the application for Foutch Brothers, the development company that Kansas City government officials have selected to try to save and repurpose Kemper Arena in the West Bottoms.

[….]

The nomination notes that Kemper was an exceptional civic and community resource and a perfect multipurpose “expression of the times” in midcentury America.

Now, Rosin points out, many old arenas have been demolished, replaced by more elaborate entertainment and sports palaces emphasizing luxury suites and amenities. They cater to the affluent and are less egalitarian.

“Not everyone could enjoy the luxury facilities, and rising ticket prices reduced the number of events that most patrons could afford to attend,” the nomination says. “The public purpose of the arena was lost for the sake of securing the revenue stream demanded by the professional sports teams.”

That’s why it’s doubly important to preserve Kemper Arena, Rosin says, adding in the nomination, “The nationwide loss of mid-twentieth century multipurpose arenas enhances the rarity and significance of Kemper as an example of its property type.”

Source: Kemper Arena could gain crucial spot on National Register of Historic Places | The Kansas City Star

Cuts to physicians with KanCare patients are unjust | The Kansas City Star

In case you thought schools, roads, and the state pension were the only Kansas institutions being sucked dry by this legislature/administration, this opinion piece does a nice job of not only pointing out that our health care infrastructure is getting the same treatment, but of providing details that explain why it isn’t just “big city” parts of the system being hurt, or just the poor, or just people of color or differently-abled.

Since Gov. Sam Brownback announced his solution to the state’s budget problem, which includes significant cuts in KanCare, the state’s Medicaid program, there has been a flurry of articles with inaccurate or incomplete information.

Source: Cuts to physicians with KanCare patients are unjust | The Kansas City Star

A Season and a Half is Sannyasa Enough

…for now.

I love you. I do not necessarily know you, at all or well; I love you, however impersonally.

Since Candlemas (aka Groundhog Day) I have been quiet in the world, though not silent or absent. It didn’t begin as anything to do with the world. I wanted to break the worst of my Facebook tracking compulsions, at least temporarily, to see if I could come back to it on healthier footing. So except for Twitter — where I turned for links to news once I realized how dependent on Facebook I’d become for that, and where heretofore unknown parts of the world dis-covered themselves to me — I kept silent for a month. And when I returned I mistook others’ shadows for my own and dropped low to the ground for the remainder of spring and now to Midsummer.

That’s over. I’m still working on the healthier footing (and basing myself here is part of that). But I return to making public records of some of my thoughts and flinging them into your feed.

Just as I do not necessarily know you, at all or well, you do not necessarily know me, at all or well or as well as you think. Some of what I write or share will be surprising or baffling or painful because you think it’s incoherent, or overstated, or incomplete, or otherwise wrong — and maybe you expected better.

Some of it is wrong. Some of it has to be. I just don’t know which of it, or how (though I have my suspicions about the parts that aren’t and some reasonably good awareness of where my ground is weak). No one owes me the time or patience required to help me sort that out, but I’m grateful whenever you do.

I offer you three considerations to take with you when you encounter my to-your-thinking errors, especially the surprises. One: however well you know me, over however long a time, consider that I am still him you knew. I don’t understand my present thinking or behavior as radically inconsistent with my past, rather only differing primarily to become (I hope) more coherent overall. If you ever thought me to any degree wise or honorable or well-intentioned, there is good reason to suppose that your reasons for doing so still hold now.

Two: what may be true with regard to the wisdom or honor or good-will of those whom you know well may also be true with regard to the same of those whom you don’t know. The surprises your acquaintances and intimates offer you may be the same offered you by strangers. Likewise the apparent folly, treachery or ill-will of strangers and familiar villains may at heart be the same as the other surprises.

Three: just as some of my thinking must be wrong, so must some of yours.

I do not say this to deny anyone’s folly or treachery or ill-will, nor to suggest that all treachery or ill-will can be diverted or broadened or allied. Disagreements regarding principle cannot be reconciled. I say this to argue for more and better arguments. They take time; they take patience. But the narrow hope that I sometimes trust for humanity depends on them. And I love you.